Questions on enrolling? We're here 9am-8pm ET Mon-Fri 1 800-583-1736

Picture of the Month Fishing Boat

By NYIP Staff on October 10, 2012


Photo by NYIP Student Rich Lanning

Fishing boat by Student Rich Lanning

There are hundreds of ways of looking at images, all of them valid. Some ways are interesting to some viewers; other viewers may seem less impressed. But neither you nor I nor any judges in any juried competition nor any journalistic critics and not even the Man in the Moon can tell someone else how to look at something. Chacun a son gout, as the French are wont to say. Of course, Henry Higgins in My Fair Lady tells us that the French don't care what they do actually as long as they pronounce it correctly.

So, this month I'm going to discuss one way of seeing coupled with two others, and the three together forming a somewhat unfamiliar but useful pattern for viewing images. Mind you, I am not in any way stating that this approach is the only way, the one True Religion as it were.

The ideas stated here are largely derived from those of three great American photographers: Alfred Stieglitz, Edward Weston, and Minor White, with whom I studied once upon a time as you'll learn in this podcast.

Taking Weston first, he believed in photographing things for their own sake. That is, if he photographed a yucca plant in Death Valley he wanted you to see what the nature of that yucca plant was. Not what it suggested nor what it symbolized nor any other kind of airy-fairy day dreaming. He wanted you to see that yucca plant looked like and nothing more. Perhaps his most famous photograph, Pepper No. 30, is an outstanding photograph of great beauty, but Edward Weston wanted you to see the "pepper" quality and nothing else. Others, including the aforementioned, Minor White, tried to read all manner of sexual innuendo into the picture, something that Weston steadfastly denied.

Minor White acknowledged that you could photograph an object for its own sake but could also photograph it for what else it might be. And added that the viewer's reaction brought a third dimension to the object for its own sake and to the object for what else it might be.

Alfred Stieglitz made a series of photographs, primarily of cloud formations that he dubbed "Equivalents". They were pictures of clouds, yes, but they were intended to evoke personal emotional responses as well. One, facetiously, is reminded of a famous "Peanuts" comic strip. In it, Lucy Van Pelt, her brother Linus, and good ol' Charlie Brown are staring up at the clouds. Lucy says that the clouds remind her of some epic scene from history. Linus claims to see a similarity to the stoning of a Christian martyr, painted by a famous Renaissance master. And good ol' Charlie Brown says that he sees a horsey and a ducky but admits that he might be mistaken.

As I said earlier, there are many ways of looking at images.

NYIP Complete Course in Professional Photography student Richard Lanning of Kintnersville, PA, created this month's photograph — the hulk of a fishing boat, the Jamie C. I feel that the photographer was following Edward Weston's dictum, namely, photographing the boat solely for its own sake, and that there are no subliminal messages here. But I cannot read the photographer's mind; there may be symbolism that eludes me.

The frame has been beautifully filled, thus simplifying the picture — the third NYIP Guideline. Attention was focused on the subject (second Guideline) by the gradations of light and shadow along the hull's planking. The bit of fence in the lower left reinforces the strong diagonal line of the boat's bow. The streaks of clouds further strengthen the image.

Fishing Boat by Rich Lanning

It appears that a polarizing filter might have been used to render the sky not a pale blue but more as a rich indigo. The wildflowers add a subtle note to the overall scene.

Bright sunlight was important here for several reasons. The sunlight increases the feeling of texture but also is necessary if a polarizing filter is to be used; such a filter will not work well on an overcast day or in the shade. So, be not afraid to photograph an object for its own sake. Be not afraid to photograph it for what else it is. Be not afraid to let your own interpretation be the synthesis of what went before.